Michel Platini, the president of UEFA, has already made quite an impression since his appointment. Has already reached an agreement over the contested issues, which have caused the dispersion of the G14 group, so ritirante the threat that form a European league detached. A club that the European Association (ECA) is established in its place and the trick is envisaged that a majority of its members will almost certainly support of Platini 's programs The chairmain of the CEC, Karlheinz Rummenigge, has indicated "The game of football is sick." The previous percussore of Germany said "Bin dell'estrattore snap, I read a statistic that says that 85% of all clubs playing professional football are running at a loss." I had a look at the problems that seem to affect the game of football in the world and how we might begin to solve them a lot, including the inflated transfer fees, wages very top player, the clubs in debt and the proposed rules on quotas player. Transfer the feesIs Cristiano Ronaldo or Kaka worth 80 million pounds? If a player wants to leave a club then the least that the player should go for is the value of the remainder of his contract. For example, if Joe Cole is on the 75,000 pounds a week, indicating a 3.6 million pounds a year. If you have to stay 4 years, its value is 14.4 million pounds, however, has two years if he goes to stay just 7.2 million pounds. These are the values that are realistic enough often paid for players of this caliber. But this assessment minimum ensure that clubs are not obliged to redeem. However, should there be a ceiling? For example, maybe if the remaining value of the contract is then offered twice to be accepted. A realistic sense of implementation of this was setting a release clause in every player contracts, which would be reviewed annually. So if the players sign an extension then the value of their release could increase, and if they continue to resolve their current contract then the value of their fall release. Release the value of any remaining = values of the 2 x, regarding the above example, if the Joe Cole had a four and Real Madrid offered 28.8 million pounds then that the offer should be accepted. Whereas, if it had only two years remain the clause would be activated to release 14.4 million pounds. Although the first glance may seem that the biggest clubs could take advantage of smaller clubs. The smaller clubs could reinvest all the money from players sold in such players as won 't be obliged to redeem it, because the players will always be available for between one and two times their remaining contract. The wagesIt sviluppantesi spiral is not possible to 'fairly' applies the adjustment without getting to grips with the financial issues in the game of football, especially increasing salaries. Deloitte, a business advisory firm higher wages suggests 55 per cent to the ratio of business to ensure financial stability. Only three Premiership clubs currently meet that test, Arsenal, Manchester United and Tottenham. I think Chelsea 's ratio is around 70 percent, 133 million pounds on salaries, about 190 million pounds of that of President Michel Platini has turnover.UEFA sets its views on reforming the finances of Europe' clubs Supreme s. Europe has warned that 'the board of s is going to "fight seriously" very, and to limit entry into the Champions League and UEFA cup for clubs who are in debt. I think it wouldn 't have the right not to grant entry to the clubs debt. Examine this in more detail later. I think the clubs should be allowed to participate until the show sustainability. Platini realizzante should examine the relationship of turnover of 55 percent. This could be called in to ensure that the clubs had time to reassess their expenses. Namely condicio 1, no tests for the ratio of salaries to turnover; condicio 2, maximum salaries of 65 percent the ratio of turnover; condicio 3, the salaries of 60 percent to the ratio lap business; condicio 4, the salaries of 55 percent to the ratio of turnover. All the club that challenges to these regulations could be banned from playing in European competitions until they respond to the tests. The regulations on taxes on salaries and transfer should be brought together and be applied in Europe by UEFA. To ensure global competitiveness, I think it was vital that FIFA also adopted regulations to ensure that they have been administered worldwide. As if the teams are limited in terms of salaries they offer, etc., then a different league could take the advantage. For example, if the first league, Serie A and all the European leagues limit the amounts players can earn, then maybe the MLS could offer 'mega-deals' for players to create a fine-bound America.Levels of our DebtBack league of the world is excellent, the English Permiership. There is no doubt that this is currently the world 's top league, given prominence to the fact that two English teams have competed in the final. The President of UEFA Michel Platini has warned that "this success is often developed at an unsustainable level of debt which, in all fairness, storch is a level playing field in Europe." That warning is concerned the two Premiership clubs who have reached the Champions League final in Moscow with their talented, highly – paid teams and staggering levels of debt. Manchester United and Chelsea have bought almost equal parts of 1.5 billion pounds owed to creditors united in opposition styles, showing the random nature of the change of management. Chelsea 's debt takes the form of interest-free loan from Roman Abramovich.Whereas the Glazer family bought units in 2005 to borrow enormous and loaded their own debts and swingeing interest payments on the club. United 'the most recent s showed the club, which had no debts before the Glazers arrived hours, with 666 loans of one million pounds, including 152 million pounds due to a fund management and alternative last year due to interest of 81 million pounds. United studying the debt of the two clubs would be an article in itself, but certainly if an investor 's investment in the club only debt is then shouldn' t the passage of the measure and the appropriate people test.6 + 5 = illegalFIFA, Sepp Blatter at least good, was widely disseminated their / its "6 + 5" rulers, aiming to ensure that at least six players in each team come from clubs club 's own country. Vladimir Spidla, Europe 's commissioner for equal opportunities,' given the red card to the 6 +5 rule '. Rule 6 + 5 is directly discriminatory and therefore incompatible with EU law. It seems that it is impossible to implement this rule [sigh of relief] because the EU 's trade laws regarding the free movement of workers within the member countries. Also seems a po'dispari who are pushing for this in particular, taking into account the "players" national rulers that has been successfully proposed by UEFA. Perhaps it 's because these regulations have yet apply to major domestic leagues, Champions League and only a few smaller domestic leagues.UEFA defines the "players" national, as those who, without regard to age or nationality, was formed by their club or another club into the National for at least three years between the ages of 15 and 21 ". The committee approved the arrangement because it's not been the player based on nationality. "Compared to the intentions announced by FIFA to impose the so-called 6 + 5 rulers which is directly discriminatory and therefore incompatible with EU law, the 'players' national rule proposed by UEFA seems to be proportional and adhere to the principle of free movement of workers ". An independent study has been conducted on "player" national, sub rulers such as Champions League and the UEFA cup club should a minimum number of "players" national in their teams. The European Commission said the basic objectives of the scheme's, to promote training for young football players, was legitimate. UEFA has put into this decision, starting from a minimum of four national players, increasing to six hours and eight, the team of twenty-five, should be national players. UEFA hit on a formula that is practical, feasible and effective, particularly when compared to Blatter '' s convicted; 6 +5 rule '. By the fact that it was illegal, the 6 +5 rule would lead to the richest clubs digging up the best British talent. So defeating one of its own objectives, which is to increase competitiveness and give smaller clubs a chance. An example: Manchester United has been portrayed by many of Fifa 's supporters as brilliant example of how six plus five are the way to go. In the final Champions League this year has worked together with six home players. But a second look revealed that four of these players (Wayne Rooney, Rio Ferdinand, Owen Hargreaves and Michael Carrick) were bought for colossal sums of money, in part due to the inflated price that normally accompanies homegrown players. Fifa 's decision to only make these players even more highly esteemed and as such only affordable to the top clubs.SummaryI would fully discussed that a combination of these factors would have made all players more widely – available to the pyramid game calcium, increasing competitiveness. First, I believe it is vital to ensure that our clubs for football are kept from the hands of so-called investors, which concludes in on the saddle of clubs have bought with large amounts of debt. Second, introducing the ratio of salaries to turnover for clubs and having a figure for all players according to their contracts (with the contracts being offered not limited to break the salaries to the rule of turnover and risking punishment principal). The continuation of UEFA 'the rule s national ensure that the investment in youth clubs were made by superiors.
Patrick Omari
